Skip to the main content
Body Visualizer 3D

Body shape types: seven female shapes, each defined by measurement

The nine named shapes of clothing research were set out in 2004 from a sample of 222 body scans at North Carolina State University, and seven of them have published cut-offs in inches.

Five female figures of the same height and weight labeled hourglass, spoon, triangle, inverted triangle and rectangle, with different bust, waist and hip girths
Five classes at 165 cm and 65 kg, in bust, waist and hip order: hourglass 98, 72 and 100 cm; spoon 92, 68 and 104 cm; triangle 88, 82 and 102 cm; inverted triangle 104, 84 and 93 cm; rectangle 96, 80 and 98 cm. Each figure is a model drawn from these measurements.

The body shape types used in clothing research are hourglass, bottom hourglass, top hourglass, spoon, triangle, inverted triangle and rectangle. Each one is set by how far the bust, waist and hips differ. The main cut-offs are 3.6 inches (9.1 cm) between bust and hips, and 9 and 10 inches (22.9 and 25.4 cm) at the waist. Two more, oval and diamond, cover a midsection that is large next to the rest of the body.

Where the classes come from

Simmons, Istook and Devarajan of North Carolina State University published the Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for Apparel in 2004. It is a program that reads bust, waist, hip, high hip, stomach and abdomen girths from a 3D body scan and names one of nine shapes. The first version had five: hourglass, oval, triangle, inverted triangle and rectangle. Many of the 222 scans fitted none of them, so the authors added spoon, diamond, bottom hourglass and top hourglass.

The 2004 papers describe each shape in words and keep the numbers inside the program. A 2007 study by Lee, Istook, Nam and Park used inch cut-offs for seven of the shapes. Sokolowski and Bettencourt (2020) and Parker and colleagues (2021) reprint those formulas, and Parker's team describes them as the algorithm the 2004 program used. FFIT was written to sort bodies for clothing fit. It is not a health measure.

The seven rules in inches and centimeters

Seven female shapes are set by bust, waist, hip and high hip differences, with cut-offs at 1, 2, 3.6, 7, 9 and 10 inches
Shape Bust against hips Waist difference High hip
Hourglass Bust at most 1 in (2.5 cm) larger, hips under 3.6 in (9.1 cm) larger Bust 9 in (22.9 cm) or hips 10 in (25.4 cm) larger than waist Not used
Bottom hourglass Hips 3.6 in to under 10 in (9.1 to 25.4 cm) larger Hips 9 in (22.9 cm) or more larger than waist Under 1.193 times waist
Top hourglass Bust over 1 in and under 10 in (2.5 to 25.4 cm) larger Bust 9 in (22.9 cm) or more larger than waist Not used
Spoon Hips over 2 in (5.1 cm) larger Hips 7 in (17.8 cm) or more larger than waist 1.193 times waist or more
Triangle Hips 3.6 in (9.1 cm) or more larger Hips under 9 in (22.9 cm) larger than waist Not used
Inverted triangle Bust 3.6 in (9.1 cm) or more larger Bust under 9 in (22.9 cm) larger than waist Not used
Rectangle Bust and hips within 3.6 in (9.1 cm) Bust under 9 in (22.9 cm) and hips under 10 in (25.4 cm) larger than waist Not used

The program checks the rules in that order and stops at the first one that holds. A body that fits none is left unclassed: Lee's team reported 5 such women among more than 6,300 in the US sample. The high hip is the largest girth in the top quarter of the distance from the crotch up to the waist. It only separates spoon from bottom hourglass.

The reprints differ at a few edges. Sokolowski and Bettencourt put a high hip of exactly 1.193 times the waist in spoon, and Parker's table needs more than 1.193. Parker's team also prints the cut-offs in centimetres: 9.14, 22.86 and 25.4. The body shape calculator follows the Sokolowski and Bettencourt wording and lists every rule beside the numbers entered.

Oval and diamond

In the 2004 papers a diamond has an average of stomach, waist and abdomen girths larger than the bust. An oval has a large midsection too, but that average is smaller than the bust. The 2007 formulas leave both out. Sokolowski and Bettencourt brought them back in 2020 for plus-size scans, using three measurements only. A waist larger than the hips is an oval when the bust is at least as large as the waist. It is a diamond when the waist is larger than the bust as well. The calculator applies those two rules before the other seven.

Pear, apple and banana are informal names

Fruit and letter names come from magazines, books and websites, and they have no cut-offs of their own. The 2004 paper sorted the common ones into groups.

The 2004 FFIT paper groups pear with triangle, apple with oval and ruler with rectangle
Everyday names Group in the 2004 paper
Pear, spoon, "A" frame, Christmas tree Triangle
Apple, circle or round, diamond, "O" frame Oval
Ruler, "H" frame Rectangle
Figure 8, "X" frame Hourglass
Cone, "V" frame Inverted triangle

A pear body shape therefore points to hips larger than the bust, and the measured rules split such figures three ways: bottom hourglass, spoon and triangle. An apple body shape points to the oval and diamond classes. Banana is not in the 2004 list. It is an informal name for the straight figure, the rectangle body shape.

Five classes drawn at one height and weight

Five of the classes, drawn at 165 cm and 65 kg, differ in girths alone.

Five classes at 165 cm and 65 kg span 16 cm at the bust, 16 cm at the waist and 11 cm at the hips
Class Bust Waist Hips What decides it
Hourglass 98 cm (38.6 in) 72 cm (28.3 in) 100 cm (39.4 in) Bust 10.2 in larger than waist
Spoon 92 cm (36.2 in) 68 cm (26.8 in) 104 cm (40.9 in) Hips 4.7 in over bust, high hip 1.213 times waist
Triangle 88 cm (34.6 in) 82 cm (32.3 in) 102 cm (40.2 in) Hips 5.5 in over bust, 7.9 in over waist
Inverted triangle 104 cm (40.9 in) 84 cm (33.1 in) 93 cm (36.6 in) Bust 4.3 in over hips, 7.9 in over waist
Rectangle 96 cm (37.8 in) 80 cm (31.5 in) 98 cm (38.6 in) Hips 0.8 in over bust, bust 6.3 in over waist
Two female figures of 165 cm and 65 kg: a top hourglass with a 102 cm bust, 76 cm waist and 96 cm hips, and a bottom hourglass at 92, 79 and 104 cm
The other two classes at the same 165 cm and 65 kg: a top hourglass at 102, 76 and 96 cm and a bottom hourglass at 92, 79 and 104 cm. Both are models drawn from these measurements.

The two remaining classes sit on either side of the hourglass. The top hourglass at 102, 76 and 96 cm has a bust 2.4 inches larger than the hips and 10.2 inches larger than the waist. The bottom hourglass at 92, 79 and 104 cm has the same bust and hips as the spoon. Its high hip of 89.4 cm is 1.132 times the waist, under the 1.193 line, so the class changes. Any set of measurements can be drawn the same way in the 3D body visualizer.

Worked example: 36, 29 and 40 inches

Take a bust of 36 in (91.4 cm), a waist of 29 in (73.7 cm), a high hip of 35.5 in (90.2 cm) and hips of 40 in (101.6 cm). The hips are 4 inches larger than the bust, so the hourglass rule fails at its 3.6 inch limit. Bottom hourglass passes on bust and waist, since the hips are 11 inches larger than the waist. It fails on the high hip, which is 1.224 times the waist when the rule needs less than 1.193. Top hourglass fails because the bust is smaller than the hips.

Spoon is next. It asks for hips more than 2 inches larger than the bust and at least 7 inches larger than the waist. The high hip must be at least 1.193 times the waist. Every condition holds, so the class is spoon. With a high hip of 34 in (86.4 cm) the ratio would be 1.172 and the class would be bottom hourglass.

Which shapes are most and least common

Rectangle is the largest class in both US survey counts, at 30.5% and about 46%, and hourglass leads the UK sample at 30.9%
Class US, 222 scans (2004) US, 531 SizeUSA scans (2004) US, over 6,300 women (2006) UK, 1,679 scans (2021)
Hourglass 48 (21.6%) 99 (18.6%) 8% 518 (30.9%)
Bottom hourglass 89 (40.1%) 93 (17.5%) not printed 447 (26.6%)
Top hourglass 0 20 (3.8%) not printed 62 (3.7%)
Spoon 38 (17.1%) 73 (13.7%) a little over 20% 194 (11.6%)
Triangle 4 (1.8%) 15 (2.8%) not printed 22 (1.3%)
Inverted triangle 0 5 (0.9%) nearly 14% 10 (0.6%)
Rectangle 35 (15.8%) 162 (30.5%) about 46% 425 (25.3%)
Oval 8 (3.6%) 59 (11.1%) no such class not classed
Diamond 0 5 (0.9%) no such class not classed

The answer depends on the sample. Rectangle is the largest class in both US survey counts. The larger one is an analysis of more than 6,300 women that North Carolina State University released in 2006. Lee's team found the same in both the US and Korea, though their abstract gives no shares. The 222-scan sample was mostly North Carolina students, and bottom hourglass led it. Among the UK women the hourglass body shape came first, and one woman of the 1,679 fitted no class.

The least common shape is less clear. The inverted triangle body shape has the smallest count of the seven in the three samples with printed counts, yet it holds nearly 14 percent of the 2006 analysis. The first two samples were sorted into nine classes and the 2006 one into seven, with no oval or diamond.

Where the tape sits changes the shares. Parker and colleagues classed all 1,679 women under three sets of tape positions. Between 21.9% and 39.6% of them changed class from one set to another.

What exists for men

No agreed standard turns a man's chest, waist and hip measurements into a shape name. FFIT covers women only. The sizing standards that Chun (2012) compared sort men by drop, which is chest minus waist. ISO/TR 10652:1991 starts at an athletic type with a 16 cm drop and a regular type at 12 cm. It ends at a corpulent type whose waist is 6 cm larger than the chest.

Research surveys form their own groups. Tiwari and Anand (2024) grouped the valid scans of 12,546 Indian men into three: trapezoid at 41.06%, inverted trapezoid at 34.92% and rectangle at 24.02%. For a man, the body shape calculator reports the drop and gives no shape name.

Body types are a separate scheme. Ectomorph, mesomorph and endomorph date from William Sheldon's books of 1940 and 1942 and rate a body's build with three numbers.

Try it on a figure

Questions people ask

How many female body shape types are there?

The FFIT system from 2004 names nine: hourglass, bottom hourglass, top hourglass, spoon, triangle, inverted triangle, rectangle, oval and diamond. Seven have published cut-offs in inches, and oval and diamond were given simpler rules in 2020.

Shorter lists of four or five shapes, such as hourglass, pear, apple, rectangle and inverted triangle, are informal and have no agreed cut-offs.

What is the most common female body shape?

Rectangle, in the US counts. It made up about 46 percent of more than 6,300 women in an analysis North Carolina State University released in 2006, and 162 of 531 scans (30.5%) in a 2004 draw from the SizeUSA survey.

Hourglass led a UK sample of 1,679 women at 30.9%, ahead of bottom hourglass at 26.6% and rectangle at 25.3%.

What is the rarest female body shape?

The samples disagree. Inverted triangle had the smallest count of the seven measured shapes in a 2004 draw of 531 US scans (5 women) and among 1,679 UK women (10).

In a 2006 analysis of more than 6,300 US women it was the third largest group at nearly 14 percent. That release prints no share for triangle, top hourglass or bottom hourglass. It says the top four shapes cover almost 90 percent of women.

Is a pear shape the same as a triangle shape?

They overlap. The 2004 FFIT paper lists pear, spoon and "A" frame in its triangle group, which means hips larger than the bust.

The measured rules divide those figures into three classes. A triangle has hips less than 9 inches larger than the waist. Spoon and bottom hourglass have a more defined waist and are told apart by the high hip.

Do these body shape types apply to men?

No. They were built from scans of women. Men's sizing standards sort by drop, which is chest minus waist, and no agreed standard gives a man a shape name from his measurements.

Does body shape show how healthy someone is?

The FFIT classes were made to sort bodies for clothing fit. They are not a health measure. For a person's own health, a doctor or nurse is the one to ask.

10 sources
  1. Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for Apparel, Part I: Describing Female Shapes, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, North Carolina State University, 2004 (archived copy). Accessed 14 November 2026.
  2. Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for Apparel, Part II: Development of Shape Sorting Software, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, North Carolina State University, 2004 (archived copy). Accessed 14 November 2026.
  3. Validation of Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for Apparel Software, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, North Carolina State University, 2004 (archived copy). Accessed 14 November 2026.
  4. Comparison of body shape between USA and Korean women (abstract), International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, Emerald, 2007. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  5. Modification of the Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) Formulas to Include Plus Size Bodies, Proceedings of 3DBODY.TECH 2020. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  6. Assessing the female figure identification technique's reliability as a body shape classification system (accepted manuscript), Ergonomics, 2021, held by the Loughborough University repository. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  7. Using SizeUSA to Improve Apparel Fit, International Foundation of Fashion Technology Institutes, 2006 conference paper. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  8. Fashion Designers Ignoring Shapes of Women's Bodies, North Carolina State University news release, 20 February 2006, on Newswise. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  9. Men's and women's body types in the global garment sizing systems, The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 2012. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  10. Comprehensive Analysis of Body Shapes in the Indian Male Population: A National and Regional Study, AHFE Open Access, Human Factors for Apparel and Textile Engineering, 2024. Accessed 14 November 2026.