Skip to the main content
Body Visualizer 3D

Inverted triangle body shape: the measurements for women and men

Published shares of the inverted triangle run from 5 of 531 US body scans in a 2004 draw to nearly 14 percent of more than 6,300 US women in a 2006 analysis.

Four female figures: an inverted triangle with a 104 cm bust, 85 cm waist and 94 cm hips from the front and the side, a top hourglass at 104, 80 and 94 cm, and a rectangle at 99, 85 and 94 cm
An inverted triangle at 104, 85 and 94 cm (bust, waist, hips), front and side, next to a top hourglass with an 80 cm waist and a rectangle with a 99 cm bust. All are 168 cm and 66 kg. Each figure is a model drawn from these measurements.

An inverted triangle body shape has a bust or chest clearly larger than the hips and a waist that is not sharply narrower. Clothing research gives women two measured conditions. The bust is at least 3.6 inches (9.1 cm) larger than the hips, and it is less than 9 inches (22.9 cm) larger than the waist. For men there is no agreed rule in numbers. Men's sizing standards sort by chest minus waist, called the drop.

The measurements that define it for women

Inverted triangle is one of nine shapes in the Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT), a shape sorting program from North Carolina State University. Simmons, Istook and Devarajan published it in 2004. Their papers describe the shape in words: a bust larger than the hips and a small difference between bust and waist. The figure looks fuller at the bust than at the hips and has no defined waistline.

The cut-offs in inches are credited to Lee, Istook, Nam and Park (2007) by two later papers that reprint them. Both conditions must hold.

An inverted triangle needs a bust at least 3.6 inches larger than the hips and less than 9 inches larger than the waist
Measurement Inches Centimeters
Bust minus hips 3.6 or more 9.1 or more
Bust minus waist less than 9 less than 22.9

Three tape measurements feed the rule. In FFIT the bust is the level girth across the fullest part. The waist is the smallest girth between bust and hips, and the hips are the largest girth between the waist and the crotch. Shoulder width is not used. The same two conditions run in the body shape calculator, which lists each rule beside the numbers entered.

The name is also used loosely. The 2004 paper's list of common figure names groups inverted triangle with cone and "V" frame. It describes them as shoulders wider than hips, with a large chest and narrow hips, and gives no numbers.

How it differs from a top hourglass

A top hourglass also has a bust larger than the hips. The waist separates the two classes: a top hourglass has a bust at least 9 inches (22.9 cm) larger than the waist.

The bust to waist difference separates an inverted triangle from a top hourglass, and the bust to hip difference separates it from a rectangle
Class Bust minus hips Bust minus waist
Inverted triangle 3.6 in (9.1 cm) or more under 9 in (22.9 cm)
Top hourglass over 1 in and under 10 in (2.5 to 25.4 cm) 9 in (22.9 cm) or more
Rectangle under 3.6 in (9.1 cm) under 9 in (22.9 cm)
Hourglass 1 in (2.5 cm) or less 9 in (22.9 cm) or more

A rectangle also needs hips less than 10 inches (25.4 cm) larger than the waist. An hourglass can qualify through hips at least 10 inches larger than the waist instead. A bust-larger figure under both lines is a rectangle body shape.

The 2004 program checks for top hourglass before inverted triangle. Its authors noted that a figure that just misses top hourglass usually ends up an inverted triangle, for lack of waist definition. The seven rules leave one gap on this side. A bust 10 inches (25.4 cm) or more larger than the hips fits no class when the waist difference is 9 inches or more.

Worked example: 104, 85 and 94 cm

Take a bust of 104 cm (40.9 in), a waist of 85 cm (33.5 in) and hips of 94 cm (37.0 in). The bust is 10 cm (3.9 in) larger than the hips, past the 3.6 inch line. It is 19 cm (7.5 in) larger than the waist, short of 9 inches. Both conditions hold, so the class is inverted triangle.

Now change one number at a time. With the waist at 80 cm (31.5 in), the bust is 24 cm (9.4 in) larger than the waist and the class becomes top hourglass. Put the waist back at 85 cm and lower the bust to 99 cm (39.0 in). The bust is then only 5 cm (2.0 in) larger than the hips, and the class becomes rectangle. Drawn at 168 cm and 66 kg, the three sets of numbers give figures that differ only at the bust and waist. The 3D body visualizer draws any other set of measurements in the same way.

How common the inverted triangle is

The published counts disagree widely.

Published shares of the inverted triangle run from 0% of 222 women to nearly 14% of more than 6,300
Sample Women Inverted triangles Share
North Carolina sample used to build FFIT, 2004 222 0 0%
Random draw from the SizeUSA survey, 2004 531 5 0.9%
North Carolina State University analysis, 2006 more than 6,300 not printed nearly 14%
UK scans with FFIT tape positions, 2021 1,679 10 0.6%
Same UK women with SizeUK tape positions 1,679 21 1.3%

The 14 percent figure comes from a university news release of February 2006, which describes the shape as a bust three or more inches larger than the hips. It made inverted triangle the third largest group, after rectangle at about 46 percent and spoon at a little more than 20 percent. A conference paper by Newcomb and Istook the same year gives the same order for the SizeUSA women. It puts inverted triangle second among women over 55.

The samples were sorted in different ways and drawn from different groups. Both 2004 counts used the nine-class program, which placed 59 of the 531 women in the oval class. The 2006 analysis used seven classes with no oval or diamond. Sokolowski and Bettencourt later found that the seven formulas class some large-waist scans as inverted triangles or rectangles. The UK women had a mean age of 31.5, and the North Carolina sample was mostly students.

The UK study by Parker and colleagues compared three sets of tape positions. Agreement for the inverted triangle was 100% in each comparison, the highest of any class. That study also measured shoulders, which the rules leave out. Inverted triangles had the widest shoulder-to-shoulder measurement, 44 cm, against about 37 cm on average for the hourglass, bottom hourglass, spoon and triangle classes.

Inverted triangle for men

Only women were scanned to build FFIT, so the 3.6 and 9 inch lines do not transfer to men. Chun (2012) compared the sizing standards of the US, UK, Germany, Japan, Korea and ISO. None of them uses shape names such as triangle for men. They set men's build types by drop. ISO/TR 10652:1991 sets five male types. Athletic has a 16 cm drop, regular 12 cm, portly 6 cm and stout 0 cm, and the corpulent type has a waist 6 cm larger than the chest. The US standard ASTM D6240-98 defines no body types and holds the drop close to 15 cm (6 in) across sizes 34 to 45.

Three male figures with a 104 cm chest and 98 cm hips and waists of 88, 92 and 98 cm, giving chest minus waist drops of 16, 12 and 6 cm
Three male figures at 176 cm and 80 kg with a 104 cm chest and 98 cm hips. Waists of 88, 92 and 98 cm give drops of 16, 12 and 6 cm, the athletic, regular and portly types of ISO/TR 10652:1991. The figures are models drawn from these measurements.

Research on men's scans uses other names. A 2024 survey by Tiwari and Anand, with valid scans of 12,546 Indian men, found three groups and no inverted triangle. Its closest group is the inverted trapezoid, with 34.92% of the men. In that group the chest was 7 to 9 cm larger than the waist and up to 7 cm larger than the hips. The ranges belong to that one survey and are not a standard. For a man, the body shape calculator reports the drop and the chest to hip difference and gives no shape name.

Try it on a figure

Questions people ask

What is an inverted triangle body shape?

It is a figure whose bust or chest is clearly larger than the hips, with a waist that is not sharply narrower. In the measured rules for women, the bust is at least 3.6 inches (9.1 cm) larger than the hips and less than 9 inches (22.9 cm) larger than the waist.

What measurements make an inverted triangle?

Three girths: bust, waist and hips. Subtract the hips from the bust, then the waist from the bust. A first answer of 3.6 inches or more and a second answer under 9 inches give an inverted triangle.

A bust of 104 cm, a waist of 85 cm and hips of 94 cm qualify: the bust is 3.9 inches larger than the hips and 7.5 inches larger than the waist.

Is an inverted triangle the same as a top hourglass?

No. Both have a bust larger than the hips, but a top hourglass has a bust at least 9 inches (22.9 cm) larger than the waist. An inverted triangle has a smaller bust to waist difference.

The 2004 FFIT program checks for top hourglass first, so a figure that just misses that waist difference is classed as an inverted triangle.

How rare is the inverted triangle body shape in women?

It depends on the sample. Three counts are low: none of 222 women in the 2004 North Carolina sample, 5 of 531 in a random draw from the SizeUSA survey (0.9%) and 10 of 1,679 UK women (0.6%).

A North Carolina State University analysis of more than 6,300 US women, released in 2006, put it at nearly 14 percent, the third largest group.

Is there a measurement rule for the male inverted triangle?

There is no agreed one. Only women were scanned to build the FFIT rules. The sizing standards that Chun compared in 2012 sort men by drop, which is chest minus waist. ISO/TR 10652:1991 puts its athletic type at a 16 cm drop and its regular type at 12 cm.

Do shoulders count toward an inverted triangle?

Not in the measured rules, which use bust, waist and hips only. A UK study of 1,679 women found that those classed as inverted triangles had the widest shoulder-to-shoulder measurement of the seven classes, 44 cm.

10 sources
  1. Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for Apparel, Part I: Describing Female Shapes, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, North Carolina State University, 2004 (archived copy). Accessed 14 November 2026.
  2. Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for Apparel, Part II: Development of Shape Sorting Software, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, North Carolina State University, 2004 (archived copy). Accessed 14 November 2026.
  3. Validation of Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for Apparel Software, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, North Carolina State University, 2004 (archived copy). Accessed 14 November 2026.
  4. Comparison of body shape between USA and Korean women (abstract), International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, Emerald, 2007. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  5. Modification of the Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) Formulas to Include Plus Size Bodies, Proceedings of 3DBODY.TECH 2020. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  6. Assessing the female figure identification technique's reliability as a body shape classification system (accepted manuscript), Ergonomics, 2021, held by the Loughborough University repository. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  7. Using SizeUSA to Improve Apparel Fit, International Foundation of Fashion Technology Institutes, 2006 conference paper. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  8. Fashion Designers Ignoring Shapes of Women's Bodies, North Carolina State University news release, 20 February 2006, on Newswise. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  9. Men's and women's body types in the global garment sizing systems, The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 2012. Accessed 14 November 2026.
  10. Comprehensive Analysis of Body Shapes in the Indian Male Population: A National and Regional Study, AHFE Open Access, Human Factors for Apparel and Textile Engineering, 2024. Accessed 14 November 2026.